February 28, 2005 Edition   |    Back to Table of Contents   |   View Previous Issues

Tiered Rating Systems Catch On With Carriers

By Steve Tuckey

Chubb Corp. is the latest company to begin integrating a new tiered underwriting system into its personal lines risk assessment program—a process that some consumer advocates contend can be used to skirt the regulatory rate approval process.

However, it is also one that analysts and other industry observers assert will ultimately determine who will succeed and who will, in the words of one executive, "slowly whither away through many cycles of adverse selection, and eventually cease to exist as a business entity."

The Warren, N.J.-based carrier has already set in motion a system for underwriting personal homeowner renewals, and over the next year will implement it for new homeowners business and new and renewal business for personal auto coverage. Prudential analyst Jay Gelb, in a note to investors, said the new plan "could lead to faster than expected growth" for the company.

A Chubb representative, Mark Schussel, confirmed the company was undertaking an effort to "better match price to risk" but did not want to go into details for competitive reasons.

Chubb now joins the growing ranks of carriers that have moved from a more simplified form of underwriting to one that involves sometimes hundreds of variables, all in an attempt to more accurately price their books of business.

Instead of simply categorizing risks as sub-standard or standard, carriers have set numerous categories within the standard realm based on criteria that go beyond traditional factors such as age and driving record to include new considerations such as credit scores and previous liability limits.

However, not all carriers are created equal in regard to their ability to—in the words of InsurQuote Vice President Kelly Whaley—"paint a picture of the consumer’s potential for loss."

"Every company does not paint the same picture," said Mr. Whaley, whose Orem, Utah-based subsidiary of ChoicePoint markets competitive pricing data to personal lines companies to assist them in developing overall rate structures. "In fact, while some companies are painting a Mona Lisa, others are still finger-painting."

A report put out last year by McKinsey & Company in conjunction with InsurQuote ranked Cleveland area-based Progressive first in such underwriting sophistication. It cited the fact that Progressive produced 7,776 different quotes for a group of customers. That group all received the same quote from Nationwide, the carrier ranked 10th and last in the study. (With personal lines accounting for only 25 percent of its business, Chubb was not ranked in that study.)

In a report last year, then Lehman Brothers analyst Chris Winans noted that late adapters to this new underwriting technology "are largely doomed to an extended purgatory as they scramble to catch up."

"Those that do not try will see the quality of their books continue to deteriorate at the hands of those insurers that started three years ago or longer, and today are continually introducing increasingly accurate versions of their pricing models," added Mr. Winans, now an executive with AIG.

But some industry critics fear that these new and more stratified tiering schemes are ways of getting new prices through the underwriting process as opposed to the rating process, which is more highly regulated.

Birny Birnbaum, director of the Austin, Texas-based Center for Economic Justice, said official scrutiny of such pricing is avoided because "historically, regulators have not reviewed underwriting practices."

Terry Tyrpin, senior vice president for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, views the new segmentation tools as "enablers" that, for example, allow drivers who may not have been insurable in the past to be able get coverage. "It is an enabler rather than a circumnavigation of any underwriting or rating rules. Those rating standards still exist, and they can’t be bypassed simply because you are using a more segmented or sophisticated rating system," said Mr. Tyrpin.

He added that the plethora of sources now available to insurance companies allows them greater latitude in pricing.

"Insurance companies no longer have to depend solely on motor vehicle departments for driving records," he said. "In fact, they found the quality and accuracy and completeness of information on driving record alone is not as good as it should be, so therefore there was automatically a quest to try to improve the quality of underwriting by looking for alternative sources of information."

In addition to credit scores, companies now have access to more complete collision data from third party vendors—especially crucial in those states where it is not a part of the driving record, according to Mr. Tyrpin.

New variables are constantly being looked at in an attempt to paint that masterpiece. While credit may be considered an "emerging variable," according to the McKinsey-InsurQuote study, "innovative" ones include prior bodily injury claims, occupation and education.

"It stands to reason that all variables were at some point ‘new’ variables," Mr. Whaley said. "The companies that find them and incorporate them into their rating plans have a competitive advantage, although temporary, over their competition. And as times goes on, these companies begin to develop an expertise in finding and using other new variables in pricing that other companies don’t have."

Particularly in the early stages of development, carriers must not only perfect the new models but also adapt corporate cultures to fit the new underwriting philosophy, Mr. Whaley said.

"Through change, companies are getting better at developing sophisticated rating plans," he said. "Change is not easy for any company, but it is required. The only other option is to whither away through many cycles of adverse selection and eventually cease to exist as a business entity."




Reproduced from National Underwriter Edition, February 25, 2005. Copyright © 2005 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


Return to table of contents for NU Online.



 

Copyright © 2008 by The National Underwriter Company. All rights reserved.

Privacy Statement Contact Webmaster Terms of Use

   
The National Underwriter Company    5081 Olympic Boulevard, Erlanger, KY 41018    1-800-543-0874

Publisher of Insurance Books, Insurance Software and Insurance Magazines
Insurance News and Insurance Books