What The New Annuity-LTC Combo Products Might Look Like
By
Robert Grubka
As the wave of baby boomers continues to reach age 60, ensuring
their retirement security will be the driving focus of leading
companies serving this market.
The insurance industry recognizes the need to create new
products now to help boomers face their unique retirement
challenges.
Longevity has
become a real concern, and guaranteeing lifetime income will be
critical for preserving quality of life.
Access to affordable long term care becomes
increasingly important as longer lifetimes bring increased risk
of declining health. Boomers’ misjudgments about what is
required to enjoy retirement are also a concern, as results from
the 2006 3rd Annual Lincoln Long Life Survey found.
Underestimating the effects of inflation, the
amount they will spend in retirement and the significant costs
of LTC are areas where boomers may be miscalculating how much
they will need in retirement.
The survey found that 32% of respondents expect inflation to be
the same or lower over the next 20 years than over the previous
20. And 65% are underestimating their projected spending levels
in retirement, predicting they will spend less money per year
while retired than while working.
The survey also found an alarming 66% of respondents said they
do not have any LTC insurance, and only 26% have even considered
purchasing a policy.
This is clearly an indication of weakness in
boomers’ planning. The costs for LTC services are rising at a
rate that consistently outpaces general inflation in the
economy.
In 2004, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the
average annual cost of nursing home care was $70,000. In some
areas, the costs are much higher. By 2025, when today’s
67-year-old turns 86, these costs will average $140,000 a year,
according to a report by the U.S. Senate Special Committee on
Aging. For an average 2-year stay, this would result in an
approximate cost of $280,000.
The opportunity for insurance products that combine longevity
and LTC protection for consumers is clear. Carriers are looking
for ways to address these multiple needs in the most efficient
way.
The recently enacted Pension Protection Act of 2006 will help
spur further combination product development. It opened the door
for product innovation and design creativity by allowing the
introduction of tax-advantaged combination annuity-LTC insurance
products, starting in 2010. Under the PPA, the annuity
distribution payments in a combination annuity-LTC insurance
product will not be taxable if used to fund qualified LTC
expenses.
Such
hybrid products offer clients the ability to use personal assets
to meet more than one need. By combining these 2 elements on one
chassis, insurance companies are seeking to offer the right mix
of longevity protection and LTC insurance. The annuity component
focuses on addressing income and longevity needs by providing a
lifetime income stream. The LTC insurance portion focuses on
providing access to affordable care should the need arise.
There are, however, developmental hurdles to overcome in
combining these 2 types of coverage: finding a balance between
the needs and addressing state insurance requirements.
What would an annuity-LTC insurance product look like? It could
be a single-premium fixed annuity, which would accumulate assets
from the general account to fund LTC insurance premiums and
claims. Or it could have a variable annuity chassis, which
potentially would generate cash values through the subaccounts
to fund LTC insurance.
If a VA chassis is used, the account value would fluctuate.
Companies will need to understand the unique risk elements
introduced by the LTC insurance benefit in order to manage the
risk appropriately and keep the product affordable for the
client.
On one hand, using a fixed annuity offers a more stable account
value and therefore could create a simpler exercise in pricing
and risk management.
A VA component, on the other hand, offers a trade-off: a less
predictable account value vs. a chance to earn a higher return.
To provide effective longevity insurance, many clients and
advisors will desire the exposure to equity markets. This can be
done in a VA, or clients can position their total portfolio to
strike the right balance.
Three potential approaches companies might take in designing a
combination annuity-LTC insurance product are shown in the box.
As would be expected, combinations of such approaches could
work, and the need to limit the aggregate claim exposure will
play a part in finding the right balance between benefits and
cost.
Other points to consider when designing a combination annuity-LTC
insurance product will be the impact on the sales process and
the ease of doing business annuity producers have come to
expect. Companies need to ensure that the sales and underwriting
process are as efficient and effective as possible. Insurers
that find ways to streamline the process will have an advantage
by incorporating LTC insurance into an annuity without
sacrificing speed or efficiency. Selling the combined product
needs to be easy for the advisor and more affordable for the
client, and also needs to offer greater leverage of assets than
purchasing 2 separate policies.
Protecting boomers in their retirement years demands that
insurance companies bring solutions that allow boomers to
continue to take advantage of the growth in equity markets and
address LTC needs. New product designs will meet multiple needs:
protection of assets to offset market fluctuations; lifetime
income to offset the risks of longevity; and access to
affordable LTC protection. Companies that lead the retirement
income market will actively develop products that provide these
solutions while simplifying or streamlining the process for
advisors. Linking an annuity with LTC insurance could emerge as
the perfect choice for many clients.
[This article originally appeared in the March 5,
2007, print edition of National Underwriter Life & Health.]
Robert Grubka is vice president of variable annuity business for
Lincoln Financial Group, the marketing name for Lincoln National
Corp., Philadelphia, and its affiliates.
[ To
comment, click
write to the editor.
]